A SAHD Resume
This week NPR ran a story on Morning Edition concerning the topic of stay-at-home dads (SAHD) returning to the workforce (“Stay-At-Home Dads Grapple With Going Back To Work”). The root issue of the piece written by Yuki Noguchi speculated as to if SAHDs who are considering re-entering the workforce should represent their time as the family’s primary caregiver. The segment featured several SAHDs at a playgroup in the DC area, all of whom sounded like competent fathers who recognized to varied degrees the upside to their time at home. (There were downsides too—namely poop and dishes.) Despite the positives benefits of their role, it was clear a few of the dads planned on returning to work once the economy improved. The question implied then was how to deal with their time off in a job search.
Opinions differed. On one side, there were those who felt, yes, they should list their time as a domestic engineer on a resume to explain their time away while highlighting parallel job skills like managing priorities and multitasking. Some took a more creative approach employing strategies such as weaving their old job duties with their current ones or referring to themselves as consultants. But others, like The Daddy Shift’s Jeremy Adam Smith thought employers would perceive this time off as a liability, something mothers have had to deal with for years.
The point was a valid one, and it was echoed by @NYCityMama in a Twitter conversation that ensued as a result of the article. “It would be interesting,” she tweeted, “to follow dads returning to the workforce to see if they receive the same backlash as women.” I’m wondering the same thing. From my prior experience on the corporate management level, I can’t tell you the number of times I sat in meetings where other managers would grumble about a mother-to-be taking maternity leave. In some cases where said mother was a less than stellar performer, her time away was viewed as an opportunity to get rid of her.
Of course such a practice is unlawful. Having a family should never be a reason for discrimination by a current or potential employer. Yet for companies that are productivity-focused and not people-focused this sort of practice is widely prevalent. (It’s happened to my wife more than a few times.) So if it’s unfair to penalize a woman, how is it fair to hold being a stay-at-home against men who are going to back to work? The short answer is, it’s not.
And there was another dimension alluded to by @coffeewithjulie when she remarked that in some ways it may actually be tougher for fathers to return to work than women. Because of the traditional perspective commonly held to by conservative companies, women are expected (sometimes begrudgingly as mentioned earlier) to take time away from their careers in order to raise families; whereas men are not. As such, I’m curious how employers will view men who have been SAHD, and what sort of impact will this have on these dads’ potential to obtain job? If a position came down to a better qualified SAHD and a less qualified father who was never laid off, which of the two would be selected? (Maybe hiring managers should acquaint themselves with the dollar value of an at-home dad. Click here for a fun exercise.)
Like @TessasDad and @EdAtHomeDad who also were a part of the "tweeter-sation," I would prefer to remain at home. @EdAtHomeDad loved the fun of nap time and @TessasDad was about to witness his daughter’s first steps, something he may have missed otherwise. We fathers can’t always be there for such moments, but it does underscore to some degree how important it is for us to be there for our children as much as possible. As a SAHD, that’s a benefit I appreciate, especially given all the unique needs my three sons and two stepdaughters have.
Still, unless I sell a million copies of my book (…bwahahahahaha! …haha …ha …ahhh), I will have to return to work (outside the home) soon in order to keep up my financial responsibilities and the various needs of my family. This is something of a Catch-22 because on one hand I am providing for my family while at the same time to do so compromises their emotional needs by not being able to focus on them the way I can now. (And seeing as how we are forced to be a dual-income household, neither can my wife.)
I only share all of this as a way of putting into context the personal implications of this issue for me. I know there are many other dads who are in similar situations and have questions as to how to represent their SAHD duties on a resume. I’ll admit that mine reads “Real Estate Consultant & Freelance Writer, 2007 – Present,” with no mention whatsoever of multitasking, the dishes, lunches and laundry.
Based on my experience, “CEO of Household Operations” doesn’t play well in executive-level job searches where interview boards nitpick every detail through three rounds of interrogation (read corporate water-boarding) only to pass on you because three of the five members of the hiring committee thought your power tie was too red. (If they thought that was bad, they should see my credit score.) Still, there’s a lot about conflict resolution, risk mitigation, and team building that has come from my being at home, and I could make it sound real official-like.
That all said, I’d like to know is how other SAHD’s returning to work intend to explain their time as the family’s primary caregiver? Thoughts in general?
Brought to you by DadBlogs and their weekly segment Fatherhood Friday

Homemaker Man · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
Carol@NYCityMama · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
PJMullen 51p · 783 weeks ago
For me the issue isn't just how hard would it be for me to return to the work force, but what industry do I fit in? I have a degree in finance from one of the best private business schools in the country, but I'd rather chew broken glass than re-enter that world. I "bailed" on my "career" nearly two years before my son was born, so I'm almost four years removed from a professional, corporate environment. I've always had an entrepreneurial spirit, so I would prefer to go in that direction (working for a start-up, not necessarily starting my own business - the next original thought I have might be my first) or even do something related to social networking/cause marketing.
I realize that I am fortunate that my wife has an excellent career in a job she loves where she is compensated well and has excellent benefits. When the time comes for me to get a job and resume contributing to the financial aspect of my household I have the built in benefit of not needing to crush it like I used to. So, for me I have the ability to be as selective as I want in choosing my next opportunity as my potential future employee will most certainly be selective.
That being said, should I ever find myself back in the corporate world, what I do know is that I would embrace the skills set of and be sensitive to the needs of parents. I've worked for people who, as you noted, looked for opportunities to cast off a mother on maternity leave and found it distasteful then. Now, given my new perspective as a SAHD, I'd most likely value the experience and skills of a stay at home parent higher than someone without children. Obviously that would require the appropriate culture to implement such a strategy, but I would not want to be involved/work for an organization that wasn't flexible or forward thinking anyway.
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
I'm with you too on being even more sensitive to parenting needs in the workplace. I think if I find a company that values their employees' families then I'll probably put SAHD on my resume. Thanks again PJ
Elise · 783 weeks ago
We all struggle with the business world believing that SAH's, male or female, are lazy or somehow incompetent, which for anyone who has actually done it will tell you it is anything but a picnic.
What is the business world prepared to do? Offer free childcare, tutors, fitness classes, etc. so that moms and dads can continue to make money for a company who can terminate them at the drop of a hat?
I don't have any answers. It is a very good discussion.
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
ciara · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
Thanks for the comment Ciara
Jack · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
WeaselMomma · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
beta dad · 783 weeks ago
Since I have always cobbled a living together outside of the corporate world, I have the luxury of not needing to worry about my resume as much as others. As for the academic side, I don't think being a SAHD is much of a liability, especially since I'm not interested in a tenure-track position.
I've been thinking about something along the lines of Carol's idea that as the phenomenon of the SAHD becomes more common, attitudes about mothers in the workplace might change. On the flip side of that, I wonder if attitudes toward parenting might change as more men take on primary caregiving roles. Specifically, I wonder if the status of stay-at-home parents might rise as more men get involved in the field, just as the status of certain jobs (teaching, certain areas of medicine, etc.) have historically declined in status as more women have gotten involved.
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
A few years ago the Houston schools would've scarfed my up in a heartbeat, but with all the layoffs of teachers across the country, they've been paying bonuses and relocation to bring these experienced teachers in. Now things are pretty competitive. Best I can get are sub jobs until a principal takes a shine to me. I did ask the HR reps from the schools about whether I should include the SAHD stuff, and they said absolutely since it parlayed into stuff like classroom management, prioritizing tasks and child development.
I just thought of something reading your last point. I've started to notice, at least in the blogging and publishing parenting niches, a hard push by dads to have their voices heard by companies like Pampers and magazines like Parenting. I'm somewhat involved in this indirectly, but I know there's been some push back as if there's a glass ceiling for dads to break through in the mom's world.
Edathomedad · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
Keely · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
vodkamom · 783 weeks ago
xxx
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
Mocha Dad · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
chriskoenig4324 12p · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
Captain Dumbass · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
SurprisedMom · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
TechnoBabe · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
Keith Wilcox · 783 weeks ago
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
And yeah, investing into your kids and family has more value than any 401K.
David Turner · 783 weeks ago
Thanks for the great post!
CK_Lunchbox 92p · 783 weeks ago
You really should start up a blog, especially if you're just looking to vent a few things or get to know other dads like you. You can also join some really good dad communities like Dad-Blogs.com -- there's almost 800 dads in that bunch. And yeah, blogging makes not money contrary to what the people think of the vaunted mommy bloggers. =-)
Thanks again for the great comment.
lois · 783 weeks ago
Cynthia · 780 weeks ago